Red Dead Redemption II
- JaySevenZero
- Admin
- Posts: 2645
- Joined: August 27th, 2012, 4:28 pm
- Location: Liverpool, Europe, Earth
- Contact:
Red Dead Redemption II
Since the game is a mere six months away, it seems an appropriate time to get the thread started for what is undoubtedly gonna be one of - if not the - biggest release this year!
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
Yep. Looks good.
And that's the last video I'll be watching for the game.
And that's the last video I'll be watching for the game.
- KSubzero1000
- Member
- Posts: 3365
- Joined: August 26th, 2015, 9:56 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
I like a good western now and then, and this looks fairly interesting. The first one is really good.
I doubt I'll buy it at launch, though.
I doubt I'll buy it at launch, though.
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
Anyone else find this trailer oddly lacklustre?
I don't know what I was expecting, but I'm feeling more "hmm" than "whoa!".
Unlikely I'll get this one on release regardless. I took a long time to warm to RDR and I never truly loved it.
I don't know what I was expecting, but I'm feeling more "hmm" than "whoa!".
Unlikely I'll get this one on release regardless. I took a long time to warm to RDR and I never truly loved it.
- KSubzero1000
- Member
- Posts: 3365
- Joined: August 26th, 2015, 9:56 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
My guess would be that since Rockstar games are pretty much guaranteed to break sales record left and right, they are intentionally playing their cards pretty close to the chest and only showing the bare minimum necessary to generate interest in the game. No need to spoil half the game's highlights in promotional material if everyone's going to buy it regardless.
If that's the case, I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea. I'd rather have a restrained, suggestive promotion that leaves a lot to the imagination instead of the hyper-aggressive marketing so many other companies are fond of.
If that's the case, I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea. I'd rather have a restrained, suggestive promotion that leaves a lot to the imagination instead of the hyper-aggressive marketing so many other companies are fond of.
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
I think I would have quite liked a bombastic Tarantino-esque trailer with fast cuts and introducing characters with their names slamming on to the screen, though.
Rockstar have never exactly been known for their subtlety. They may as well go all in!
Rockstar have never exactly been known for their subtlety. They may as well go all in!
- Sinclair Gregstrum
- Member
- Posts: 921
- Joined: April 4th, 2013, 4:09 pm
- Location: Dore, Sheffield
- Contact:
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
So what edition are folks going for - standard, ultimate, or full-on collectors?
Find it strange they've called this 'Ultimate'...
...when you can get this...
Find it strange they've called this 'Ultimate'...
...when you can get this...
- Whippledip
- Member
- Posts: 75
- Joined: June 14th, 2017, 3:35 am
- Location: Victoria, Australia
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
Except it doesn't even include the game
- ratsoalbion
- Admin
- Posts: 7933
- Joined: August 28th, 2012, 9:41 am
- Location: Brighton, England
- Contact:
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
Yeah, that "Collector's Box" just looks like a pile of tat to me.
How much are they charging for that?
How much are they charging for that?
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
I would have gone for the collectors before seeing there's no game included.
For the ultimate edition on Game (which includes a physical copy of the game) a whopping £180!
For the ultimate edition on Game (which includes a physical copy of the game) a whopping £180!
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
I agree about the trailer. It's a little underwhelming but that's okay. I'll be buying the game for sure. I loved John Marston. He has this chivalrous, gentlemanly killer vibe that I really dig on. He is a bad personal but not beyond redemption. You see glimpses of the monster he was in the monster he is. I think he was a very subtle character, he's not even a particularly memorable looking character which I really like.
The protagonist featured in this trailer feels like a generic cowboy thug. Very stereotyped I guess. Not particularly likable or even interested in redemption. It's too soon to tell I guess. I have very little to go on so I'll withhold judgement until I play the game. It's not like I expect or want them to do the exact same take on the redemption theme.
Marston' charismatic charm will be hard to top. Not that the story and gunplay and setting weren't all great but Marston as a character is really the defining achievement of the first game. In my humble opinion. I'll hope for the best and honestly I'm pretty optimistic!
- ratsoalbion
- Admin
- Posts: 7933
- Joined: August 28th, 2012, 9:41 am
- Location: Brighton, England
- Contact:
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
Am I correct in hearing that like the first RDR there will be no PC release of this game?
- KSubzero1000
- Member
- Posts: 3365
- Joined: August 26th, 2015, 9:56 pm
- Location: Germany
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
At the risk of ruining the mood, I intend to go for the GOTY edition. All the content for two thirds of the price sounds like a decent deal to me.
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
For the ultimate edition alone (which includes a map and steelbook) its £90! Bit steep.
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
I'm generally a big sucker for the Limited Edition games, mainly Nintendo nowadays but I went through a stage during the Xbox 360 generation of collecting them all.
The biggest, most expensive and most silly I think was the Skyrim one, with the Dragon on the Wall - which is pretty freaking cool and it did come with the game, so I stand by that purchase still to this day.
Things have gotten a bit out of hand here mind, not so much the useless tat (which I actually think is rather neat in this instance) but the big versions coming without the game, it just makes the whole package seem like even more of a pointless waste of time and soulless.
The Ultimate Edition with the map, will likely be where I end up landing on this game - on the Xbox One X also as that will probably be the best performing version.
The biggest, most expensive and most silly I think was the Skyrim one, with the Dragon on the Wall - which is pretty freaking cool and it did come with the game, so I stand by that purchase still to this day.
Things have gotten a bit out of hand here mind, not so much the useless tat (which I actually think is rather neat in this instance) but the big versions coming without the game, it just makes the whole package seem like even more of a pointless waste of time and soulless.
The Ultimate Edition with the map, will likely be where I end up landing on this game - on the Xbox One X also as that will probably be the best performing version.
- ratsoalbion
- Admin
- Posts: 7933
- Joined: August 28th, 2012, 9:41 am
- Location: Brighton, England
- Contact:
Re: Red Dead Redemption II
I imagine RDRII should perform its best on XOX, though hopefully the disparity between the versions won't be as stark as it was last gen, with the 640p PS3 version of RDR being markedly inferior (this was before Rockstar managed pretty much 1:1 with Max Payne 3 and GTAV).
Also, and I've been stressing this everywhere I can, if you want to return to the previous game and you have access to an Xbox One, the version that you now have available really is a tremendous upgrade, especially on X which is pretty much tantamount to a free 'remaster':
Also, and I've been stressing this everywhere I can, if you want to return to the previous game and you have access to an Xbox One, the version that you now have available really is a tremendous upgrade, especially on X which is pretty much tantamount to a free 'remaster':